Russian International Minister and Council President for July, Sergey Lavrov accused america of exceptionalism and selling a “rules-based order” that threatens multilateralism and worldwide legislation.
Washington “calls for unquestioning obedience” from its allies, he stated, “even to the detriment of their nationwide pursuits”.
“Rule America, that’s the essence of the infamous rules-based order, which is a direct risk to multilateralism and worldwide legislation,” he asserted.
‘Wilful’ violations of the Constitution
In response, US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield chided Russian “hypocrisy” in convening a gathering on multilateral cooperation whereas “wilfully and flagrantly violating” the UN Charter’s core tenets of territorial integrity, respect for human rights and worldwide cooperation.
She denounced Russia’s warfare of aggression towards Ukraine, “a warfare that has weaponised meals”, worsening starvation not just for Ukrainians however for tens of millions worldwide, and “that has prompted Moscow to consequence to nuclear brinksmanship and to violate worldwide sanctions obligations”.
Barbara Woodward, Ambassador of the UK, reminded Council members of their duty to uphold their very own commitments by implementing and abiding by the resolutions adopted.
“It’s due to this fact very important that the Russian Authorities stops sourcing weapons from DPRK [the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] in violation of UN Security Council resolutions and stops its makes an attempt to disrupt UN efforts in Africa, together with by stopping Russian proxies’ focused actions towards MINUSCA [the UN mission in the Central African Republic],” she stated.
May isn’t proper
Referring to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, she reiterated the UK’s stance that it’s going to not settle for a world “the place may is true, and highly effective nations can bully and invade different nations with impunity”.
Chinese language Ambassador Fu Cong recalled the founding of the United Nations within the aftermath of the Second World Conflict and the ideas of peaceable coexistence superior by his nation’s leaders on the time.
Stirring up confrontation
He deplored the notion of a “rules-based worldwide order” promoted by some nations, arguing that it seeks to create a parallel system outdoors worldwide legislation, searching for “legitimacy for double requirements and exceptions”.
He referred to as on the North Atlantic Treaty Group (NATO) to cease being the “troublemaker” and expressed concern over the bloc’s searching for enlargement, creating false narratives and “stirring up confrontation between camps”.
